Arizona ChartsJudge Explorer ↗

Public evidence · Open access

Data for your
own questions.

Help a voter explore the evidence without using the dashboard. Download the same public data, with the context needed to interpret it.

Start with the guide.

Give your agent this page’s address and ask it to read the guide before comparing judges. No account or API key is needed.

Read the agent guide (Markdown) ↗

Get the evidence

Complete dataset (JSON)
Version, checksums & judge index
JSON Schema & field definitions

Check the calculation

Reference scoring code (JavaScript)
Documented source spot check
Original input file hashes

Keep the context

Snapshot: October 7, 2026. Covers 58 judges in the supplied state pamphlet’s Maricopa voter scope. Survey periods vary. This is not a personalized ballot or an official election service.

Evidence comes with limits.

For information only. AI helped extract the data from difficult-to-read, inconsistently formatted PDFs, and AI makes mistakes. Checks and limited spot checks do not guarantee accuracy or completeness. Verify important details in the linked full original reports.

Custom higher-category feedback is not an official grade or retention recommendation. Compare official findings separately. Missing answers are not zero; sample size and evidence coverage do not establish statistical reliability. The guide explains respondent weights, section rollups, the optional N filter, and the unresolved Mark H. Brain ballot-list discrepancy.

For survey claims, cite the original report and page. For calculations, include the dataset version and your question, respondent, weight, and filter choices. The voter makes the decision.

One judge at a time.

Each JSON file includes the judge, all available cohorts, applicable questions, results, and scales. Keep different instruments and periods separate.